Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 F.2d 560 - White v. Walsh

White v. Walsh’s Empirical Analysis

649 F.2d 560 · 1981

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
July 2015
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Ulmer v. Chancellor (1982), Rogers v. Bruntrager (1988)

33 federal appellate · 8 district ·

3501981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. Oklahoma · Ferri v. Ackerman · Gordon v. Leeke · Duchesne v. Sugarman · Spence v. Staras

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the defendants had directed themselves toward an unconstitutional action by virtue of a mutual understanding,' and [provide] some facts suggesting such a 'meeting of the minds.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[Conspiracies are by their nature usually clandestine. It is unlikely that a plaintiff in a conspiracy case will be able to provide direct evidence of a conspiratorial agreement. Thus, such evidence is not necessary to prove that a civil conspiracy existed. Accordingly, depending upon the conspiracy alleged in any particular case, the complainant may or may not be in a position to allege with precision the specific facts giving rise to the claim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “state[d] sufficient facts to give rise to the inference that there was ... a meeting of the minds [, and a]coordingly, the district court erred by dismissing White's complaint for lack of specificity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.