Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 F.2d 887 - Kapela v. Newman

Kapela v. Newman’s Empirical Analysis

649 F.2d 887 · 1981

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
August 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Mellon Bank Na 91-3160 v. Metro Communications Inc (1991), Coral Petroleum, Inc. v. Banque Paribas-London (1986)

3 federal appellate · 4 district ·

16019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 547

Relies on United States v. Sisson · National Bank of Newport v. National Herkimer County Bank of Little Falls · Benedict v. Ratner · Benedict v. Ratner · Sawyer v. Turpin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the key question when assets are transferred so as to benefit a guarantor is whether those assets would ordinarily have been available to help satisfy the claims of other (general) creditors.... [W]hen the bankrupt debtor’s assets are transferred to the [creditor], the transfer creates a preference in the [guarantor], provided that the creditor did not have a previously secured interest in those assets (and all other “preference” conditions were met).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'diminish[ed] the fund to which creditors of the same class [as the defendant-creditor] can legally resort for the payment of their debts.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it is important to interpret the two statutes in a way that minimizes such conflicts and harmonizes the policies that underlie them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.