McKee v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
649 F.2d 927 · 1981
Citation profile
64 federal appellate · 5 district · 87 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 194 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Cowans (1999), State v. Robinson (1993)
64 federal appellate · 5 district · 87 state decisions — followed in 27 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Davis v. Alaska · Goldstein v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 194 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'To warrant a substitution of counsel, the defendant must show good cause, such as a conflict of interest, a complete breakdown of communication or an irreconcilable conflict which leads to an apparently unjust verdict.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`If the rule were otherwise, appointed counsel could be replaced for doing little more than giving their clients honest advice.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[e]ven if counsel had explored plea options based on a belief that Cowans might be guilty, counsel's belief in their client's guilt is not good cause for substitution. "`A lawyer has a duty to give the accused an honest appraisal of his case. * * * Counsel has a duty to be candid; he has no duty to be optimistic when the facts do not warrant optimism.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.