Guevara v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
649 F.3d 1086 · 2011
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229C (§ 240b of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1324A (§ 274a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services · Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre · Marmolejo-Campos v. Holder · Garcia-Quintero v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the FUP was enacted by Congress to assist a very narrow group of aliens,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alanniz v. Barr“aliens who receive employment authorization.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alanniz v. Barr“lacks a thorough and meaningful analysis”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.