Mauerhan v. Wagner Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
649 F.3d 1180 · 2011
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 323 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12114 (§ 104 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc. · Teahan v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad · Butler v. City of Prairie Village · Mackenzie v. Denver City and County of
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]lthough participating in or completing a drug treatment program will bring an individual closer to qualifying for the safe harbor, an individual must also be no longer engaging in drug use for a sufficient period of time that the drug use is no longer an ongoing problem.”); Shafer, 107 F.3d at 279 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The ADA enlarges the scope of the Rehabilitation Act to cover private employers, but the legislative history of the ADA indicates that Congress intended judicial interpretation of the Rehabilitation Act to be incorporated by reference when interpreting the ADA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he trustee of the bankruptcy estate has the sole capacity to sue and be sued over assets of the estate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.