DK Joint Venture 1 v. Weyand’s Empirical Analysis
649 F.3d 310 · 2011
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · State of New Hampshire v. State of Maine · Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance · Russell v. Rolfs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the fact that the defendant corporations entered into [arbitration agreements does] not cause their agents ... who acted only as officers on behalf of the corporations, to be personally bound by those agreements.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[S]tatus as the CEO and CFO and agents of the defendant corporations is insufficient to personally bind [agents] to the [corporations'] arbitration agreements.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it matters whether the party resisting arbitration is a signatory or not.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.