Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 F.3d 756 - Colbert v. Tapella

Colbert v. Tapella’s Empirical Analysis

649 F.3d 756 · 2011

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
September 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 13 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens · Aka v. Washington Hospital Center

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A plaintiff cannot always avoid summary judgment by showing the employer’s explanation to be false.... For instance, an employer would be entitled to judgment as a matter of law if the record conclusively revealed some other, nondiscriminatory reason for the employer’s decision, or if the plaintiff created only a weak issue of fact as to whether the employer’s reason was untrue and there was abundant and uncontroverted independent evidence that no discrimination had occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “received numerous awards and commendations, including eight outstanding performance awards”). 4 . The page numbers for Def.’s Reply, Ex. I, as well as Pl.’s Opp’n, -Exs. 3 and 4, refer to those generated by the Court’s ECF system. 5 . The plaintiff also cites various e-mails between the plaintiff and other staff regarding the KSDS project that, in her view, demonstrate her”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.