Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

649 F. App'x 725

United States v. Doherty

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 2, 2016

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2016-05-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2017

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on Anders v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel for Michael Doherty, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Doherty’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

/649/fappx/725 · .json · Public domain