Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 F. Supp. 1418 - Froid v. Berner

649 F. Supp. 1418 - Froid v. Berner’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
August 2006
most recently cited

5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2006

5 district ·

40198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 56(e) requires a party to do more than merely rest on its pleadings; the opponent of a summary judgment motion must do more than raise ‘some metaphysical doubt’ as to the material facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.