Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 N.E.2d 1045 - Doss v. State

Doss v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · Bruce v. State · Madden v. State · Everroad v. State · Bradley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so bare bones and so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to make a reliance upon the resulting warrant objectively unreasonable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render an official belief in the existence of the warrant unreasonable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “was hearsay, there was no showing that it was false information knowingly or recklessly supplied by Schmitt. We next examine the indicia of probable cause question. The telephonic affidavit was primarily supported by information provided to Schmitt by an informant. That is, the information was hearsay. Indiana Code Section 35-33-5-2(b) provides that an affidavit for probable cause may be based on hearsay if it:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.