Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 N.E.2d 1050 - Hendricks v. State

Hendricks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2013

6 state decisions

30199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hurt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As used in this chapter, “stalk” means a knowing or an intentional course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment of another person that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened and that actually causes the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “also told Hendricks of the emergency protective order and the parameters of the order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.