Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 N.E.2d 697 - Smiley v. State

Smiley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2010

11 state decisions

70199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brannum v. State · Rinard v. State · Taylor v. State · Clark v. State · Nordstrom v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At the request of a party, the court shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of or discuss testimony with other witnesses, and it may make the order on its own motion. This rule does not authorize the exclusion of (1) a party who is a natural person, or (2) an officer or employee of a party that is not a natural person designated as its representative by its attorney, or (3) a person whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of the party’s cause.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Hernandez v. State · Heeter v. State
  2. “[T)he determination of the remedy for any violation of a separation order is wholly within the discretion of the trial court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Fourthman v. State · Childs v. State
  3. “[BJlecause a defendant has a constitutionally protected right to present evidence in his favor, exclusion of a defense witness due to a violation of a witness separation order is not always appropriate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Childs v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.