Farella v. Rumney’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2023
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Rock Springs v. Sturm · Madrid v. Norton · Da Shores v. Dl Lindsey · Johnson v. AETNA CAS. & SUR. CO. OF HARTFORD · Snell v. Ruppert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We accept as true the evidence of the successful party, leave out of consideration entirely the evidence of the unsuccessful party in conflict therewith, and give the evidence of the successful party every favorable inference which may fairly and reasonably be drawn therefrom. [Citations.]” Farella v. Rumney, Wyo., 649 P.2d 185, 186 (1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ * * * [I]n almost every case it has been the conclusion of this court that when a claim such as adverse possession, which is peculiarly factual in nature, is questioned on appeal, the decision of the trial court, because of its proximity to the witnesses and evidence involved, should be given considerable deference.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Stovall““The elements of adverse possession consist of actual, open, notorious, exclusive, and continuous possession of another’s real property for the statutory period, which possession is hostile and under claim of right or color of title. * * * ” 649 P.2d at 186.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sowerwine v. Nielson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.