State v. Malmrose’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably State v. Ramirez (1991), State v. Eldredge (1989)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California · United States v. Telfaire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] trial court's determination that expert testimony would amount to a lecture to the jury as to how they should judge the evidence, and its subsequent refusal to admit such testimony into evidence 'is not an abuse of discretion, particularly where there has been no showing that the excluded evidence would probably have had a substantial influence in bringing about a different verdict.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[The failure of counsel to make motions or objections which would be futile if raised does not constitute ineffective assistance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“considerable latitude as to the manner and form of conducting the voir dire examination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.