Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 SE2D 882 - In Re Ja

In Re Ja’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 264 Ga. App. 777 - In Re BIF · In the Interest of C. R. G. · 284 Ga. App. 791 - In the Interest of R. C. M. · 279 Ga. App. 7 - In Re TL · In the Interest of A. B.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is well settled that children need permanence of home and emotional stability or they are likely to suffer serious emotional problems.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In determining the balance of the interests of the children against parental rights, the juvenile court is vested with broad discretion which will not be controlled on appeal in the absence of manifest abuse, where the ruling is supported by clear and convincing evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re Adm
  3. “(i) To develop and maintain a parental bond with the child in a meaningful, supportive manner; (ii) To provide for the care and support of the child. . .; and (iii) To comply with a court ordered plan designed to reunite the child with the parent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.