Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 So. 2d 1139 - Roy v. Coco

649 So. 2d 1139 - Roy v. Coco’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mashburn v. Collin · 390 So. 2d 196 - Cangelosi v. SCHWEGMANN BROS., ETC. · 535 So. 2d 378 - Bussie v. Lowenthal · 198 So. 2d 139 - Cormier v. Blake · State v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Certain statements are protected by privilege. A person may enjoy a qualified or conditional privilege in making a statement, if it is made (1) in good faith; (2) on a subject in which the person communicating has an interest or owes a duty; and (3) to a person having a corresponding interest or duty. * * * In order to establish the element of good faith, it must be shown that the person making the allegedly defamatory statements had reasonable grounds for believing that the statements were true and that he honestly believed the statements were correct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.