Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 SO2D 227 - Reed v. State

Reed v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Naveira (2004), 791 So. 2d 1088 - State v. Williams (2001)

25 state decisions

130199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · 405 So. 2d 418 - Jollie v. State · State v. Agee · Dorian v. State · Genden v. Fuller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(d) Custody. For purposes of this rule, a person is taken into custody. (1) when the person is arrested as a result of the conduct or criminal episode that gave rise to the crime charged, or (2) when the person is served with a notice to appear in lieu of physical arrest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We recognize that under some circumstances there may be legitimate reasons why the State is not ready to file charges against a defendant who has previously been arrested. However, the State cannot simply wait and let the speedy trial time period run. The State's remedy would appear to be to file the charges before the expiration of the speedy trial time and seek an extension under the provisions of the speedy trial rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “I agree fully with Justice Wells' dissent. I write to express my belief that the majority has now crossed the line and made our speedy trial rule substantive rather than procedural by this construction and that, consequently, it is unconstitutional.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.