¶1We affirm the appellants’ convictions and sentences. The sentencing claim pursuant to Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), is rejected because the consecutive habitual offender sentences were imposed for crimes which were part of separate criminal episodes. See Murray v. State, 491 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1986); Parker v. State, 633 So.2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), rev. denied, 639 So.2d 980 (Fla.1994).
649 So. 2d 325
Hagans v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 26, 1995
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-01-26
Relies on 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State · 639 So. 2d 972 - Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Funding for Criminal Justice · 491 So. 2d 1120 - Murray v. State
Decided 1995-01-26