Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 So. 2d 569 - State v. Mitchell

649 So. 2d 569 - State v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2015

9 state decisions

40199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Tibbs v. Florida · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King · Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence. A bill of exceptions to rulings or orders is unnecessary. It is sufficient that a party, at the time the ruling or order of the court is made or sought, makes known to the court the action which he desires the court to take, or of his objections to the action of the court, and the grounds therefor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Generally, evidence of other acts of misconduct is inadmissible; however, there are statutory and jurisprudential exceptions to this exclusionary rule, when the evidence of other acts tends to prove a material issue and has independent relevance other than showing that the defendant is a man of bad character.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[p]articular acts, vices, or courses of conduct of a witness may not be inquired into or proved by extrinsic evidence for the purpose of attacking his character for truthfulness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.