Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 SO2D 604 - State v. Fisher

State v. Fisher’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2016

9 state decisions

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Delaware v. Prouse · State v. Sepulvado · Cryts v. French

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An individual cannot be stopped in his automobile by a police officer, without a warrant, unless the officer had a reasonable suspicion that the individual has committed, or is about to commit, a criminal offense, including the violation of a traffic regulation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “‘(1) A vehicle shall be driven as nearly as practicable entirely within a single lane and shall not be moved from such lane until the driver has first ascertained that such movement can be made with safety.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.