Wyatt v. Haese’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably 750 So. 2d 140 - Chapman v. Sheffield (2000), Hernandez v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. (2010)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 489 So. 2d 758 - Falkner v. AMERIFIRST FEDERAL SAV. AND LOAN · 123 So. 2d 745 - Lendsay v. Cotton · 512 So. 2d 1129 - Kennedy v. Richmond · Baker v. Baker · Watson v. Watson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and the second notice sent by regular mail and returned”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he purpose of service, substituted or otherwise, is to provide the defendant with notice so that he might exercise his opportunity to be heard.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Notice of service and a copy of the process shall be sent forthwith by registered or certified mail by the plaintiff or his or her attorney to the defendant, and the defendant’s return receipt and the affidavit of the plaintiff or his or her attorney of compliance shall be filed on or before the return day of the process or within such time as the court allows....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cohen v. Aponte
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.