¶1We affirm the trial court’s order denying the motion to suppress. However, we strike the special condition of probation prospectively imposing appellate costs. Davis v. State, 641 So.2d 972, 973 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Anderson v. State, 632 So.2d 132, 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
649 So. 2d 943
McDonald v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 15, 1995
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-02-15
Relies on 632 So. 2d 132 - Anderson v. State · Russell v. State
Decided 1995-02-15