State v. Marquadis’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1997
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Shockley v. State · State v. Martin · Houston v. State · Bell v. Harrison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is elementary that the exclusion of immaterial and irrelevant evidence does not abridge an accused’s right of confrontation. The right of confrontation merely secures to an accused the right to be confronted with the witnesses who are produced to prove such matters as are competent evidence against the accused under settled principles of law.” 23 C.J.S. Criminal Law Sec. 999 (1961).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. West
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.