Parker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
June 1999
most recently cited
25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Wade · Wainwright v. Sykes · Griffin v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When a defendant asserts the insanity defense and introduces supporting psychiatric testimony, his silence may deprive the State of the only effective means it has of controverting his proof on an issue that he interjected into the case. Accordingly, several Courts of Appeals have held that, under such circum stances, a defendant can be required to submit to a sanity examination conducted by the prosecution’s psychiatrist.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Penry v. State“This court has granted relief under Estelle v. Smith, supra in some cases, even though no contemporaneous objection was made at trial, applying what this court perceived to be federal constitutional law rejecting a waiver of this error. These decisions did not decline to enforce the state contemporaneous objection requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.