State v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1991
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Franco · State v. Holt · State v. Reed · State v. Roesel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The extent of cross-examination on collateral matters for the purpose of impeachment is largely within the trial court’s discretion.... Absent a clear showing of any abuse of discretion by the trial court in restricting cross-examination, its ruling will not be disturbed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McLaurin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.