649 SW2D 580 - State v. Warner

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2011

4 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1On Rehearing

FONES, Chief Justice.

¶2Defendant has filed a petition to rehear the essence of which is an assertion that although the Court granted the Rule 11 application of the State, we were obligated under T.R.A.P. 13(a) to respond in our opinion to four issues defendant elected to brief.

¶3Defendant’s interpretation of T.R.A.P. 13(a) is erroneous, as a careful reading of the advisory commission’s comments will reveal.

¶4We have fully considered defendant’s contentions on the issues not dealt with in our opinion and have found either that the Court of Criminal Appeals adequately and properly dealt with them or that they are without merit.

¶5The Petition to Rehear is denied.

¶6COOPER, BROCK, HARBISON and DROWOTA, JJ., concur.