Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 S.W.2d 637 - Schaffer v. State

Schaffer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Linkletter v. Walker · United States v. Jorn · Arizona v. Washington · Illinois v. Somerville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial judge properly exercises his [or her] discretion to declare a mistrial if an impartial verdict cannot be reached, or if a verdict of conviction could be reached but would have to be reversed on appeal due to an obvious procedural error in the trial. If an error would make reversal on appeal a certainty, it would not serve the ends of public justice to require that the Government proceed with its proof when, if it succeeded before the jury, it would automatically be stripped of that success by an appellate court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.