Mindell v. Glenn’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1985
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schwartz v. Murphy · Knowles v. Mosher · United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers of America v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. · Shipley v. Major · Haines v. State Insurance Fund
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Code. With this we agree. The Code clearly states that a plea of title is to be raised by a plea under oath, accompanied':by a sufficient undertaking to pay all intervening costs and damages. -When- it appears that -title to land is necessarily and directly in issue, the case is - to be certified to the District Court as the Municipal Court has no jurisdiction to try title to real property. 5 It is well settled that this section of the Code is mandatory, 6 and if not complied with no question of title can be .brought into the case. 7 In the instant case; defendant has failed to comply with these mandatory provisions and his failure to do so prevented the trial court from considering any question of plaintiff’s title to the .property in dispute. Plaintiff should not be subjected to an indefinite delay of his possessory claim without the protection of a bond for the intervening rent .and damages... ,We rule that as plaintiff has legal title to the premises in dispute, he has a right to a trial of his claim for”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.