H.M. v. E.T.’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 666 (§ 466 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he [f]amily [c]ourt is a court of limited jurisdiction whose powers are strictly limited to those conferred by the Legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Landreth v. Malik“The [f]amily [c]ourt has limited jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Landreth v. Malik
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.