Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 ALA 169 - Porter v. Smith

Porter v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1880

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
4
states following
December 1982
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 1982

15 state decisions

4018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Snodgrass v. Branch Bank at Decatur · Johnson v. Johnson · Wear v. Skinner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ In actions seeking relief on the ground of fraud, where the statute has created a bar, the cause of action must not be considered as having accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud, after which he must have one year within which to prosecute his suit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.