Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

65 Ala. 605

Hinson v. Gamble

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1880

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1880-12-15

Heard before tbe Hon. John A. Foster. The. bill in this case was filed on tbe 9th October, 1879, by Gamble & Bolling, attorneys-at-law, suing as partners, against Mrs. Elizabeth Hinson and ber husband, John E. Hinson ; and sought to condemn by process of garnishment against Conrad Wall, who was also made a defendant, a debt clue from Mm to Mrs. Hinson for tbe purchase-money of a tract of land, which had belonged to Mrs. Hinson’s statutory separate estate; and to subject it,…

Relies on Lee v. Tannenbaum · Warfield v. Campbell · Janney v. Buell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1880-12-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1918

6 state decisions

301880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

STONE, J.

¶1— An attorney, defending successfully the right and title to a tract of land, against an unjust claim, or unwarranted attempt to subject it to an alleged lien or liability, can not assert a lien on the land thus successfully defended, for his lawful fees and charges. — 1 Wait’s Actions cfc Defenses, 453-4 ; 2 Story’s Eq., § 1233 a; Warfield v. Campbell, 38 Ala. 527; 2 Kent’s Com., 640-41.

¶2Until March 1st, 1881, professional services rendered by an attorney-at law, in defending the title to statutory separate property of a married woman, did not fasten a charge upon her statutory estate, under section 2711 of the Code of 1876. — See Pamph. Acts, 1880-1, p. 36.

¶3The statutory separate estate of the wife can not be subjected by suit in chancery to liability for articles of comfort and support of the household, under section 2711 of the Code. If there be a liability, it can be enforced only in a court of law, and in the form provided by that statute. — Gilbert v. Dupree, 63 Ala. 331; Wilburn v. McCalley, Ib. 436; Ridley v. Hereford, at the present term; Conly v. Blue, 62 Ala. 77; Lee v. Tannenbaum, 62 Ala. 501; O’Connor v. Chamberlain, 59 Ala. 431; Janney v. Buell, 55 Ala. 408.

¶4The decree of the chancellor is reversed, and the bill is dismissed, at the cost of the appellees.

/65/ala/605 · .json · Public domain