Shreeve v. Greer’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
2 district · 75 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Smith v. Tang (1966), Cote v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc. (1981)
2 district · 75 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tourette v. Tourette · Garver v. Thoman · Steward v. Sirrine · Schmidt v. Barr · Strahan v. Haynes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A memorandum, in order to make enforceable a contract within the Statute, may be any document or writing, formal or informal, signed by the party to be charged or by his agent actually or apparently authorized thereunto, which states with reasonable certainty, (a) each party to the contract either by his own name, or by such a description as will serve to identify him, or by the name or description of his agent, and (b) the land, goods or other subject-matter to which the contract relates, and (c) the terms and conditions of all the promises constituting the contract and by whom and to whom the promises are made.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“in writing, subscribed by the party sought to be charged.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"* * * Heap, as head of his community, was lawfully entitled to act for and on behalf of it and bind it. Section 63-303, A.C.A. 1939; La Tourette v. La Tourette, 15 Ariz. 200 , 137 P. 426 , Ann. Cas. 1915B, 70; Bristol v. Moser, 55 Ariz. 185 , 99 P.2d 706 ; Vol. I, sections 113-116, Principles of Community Property (de Funiak). Any contract he made looking toward the purchase of the real estate was presumably a contract made for the community and its benefit. * * *" 65 Ariz. at 40 , 173 P.2d at 645”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. King v. Uhlmann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.