65 Ark. App. 186 - Shaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 352 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Manning v. State · 60 Ark. App. 206 - Ramsey v. State · Collins v. Beste · Phillips v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Statements made by an owner or by anyone else in control of the substance concerning the nature of the substance, or its use or effect; (2) The physical appearance of the finished product containing the noncontrolled substance is substantially the same as that of a specific controlled substance; (3) The noncontrolled substance is unpackaged or is packaged in a manner normally used for the illegal delivery of a controlled substance; (4) The noncontrolled substance is not labeled in accordance with 21 U.S.C. § 352 or § 353; (5) The person delivering, attempting to deliver, or causing delivery of the noncontrolled substance states or represents to the recipient that the noncontrolled substance may be resold at a price that substantially exceeds the value of the substance; (6) Evasive tactics or actions utilized by the owner or person in control of the substance to avoid detection by law enforcement authorities; (7) Prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or anyone in control of the object under state or federal laws related to controlled substances or fraud[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is unlawful for any person to create, deliver, or possess with intent to deliver, a counterfeit substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.