In Re Abdo’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2006
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Caminetti v. United States · Colautti v. Franklin · 297 F. Supp. 33 - Chapiewsky v. G. Heileman Brewing Company · Lipshie v. Bartley (In Re Bartley) · 376 F. Supp. 1043 - C-Line, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“currency of the United States at face value, savings bonds of the United States at face value, the right to receive a refund of federal, state and local income taxes, and deposit accounts in any state or federally chartered depository institution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re DeVries
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.