Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

65 Cal. 360

Walker v. McCusker

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1884

California Supreme Court · decided 1884-06-28

<p>Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Monterey County, refusing to dissolve an attachment.</p> <p>The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.</p>

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““The liability of the tenant in possession to the purchaser, for rents or use and occupation from the day of sale to the expiration of the time for redemption, is a statutory liability merely, and exists without the assent of the person in possession. It is not a liability founded on a contract express or implied, within the meaning of section 537 of the Code of Civil Procedure, authorizing the issuance of an attachment. ’ ’”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Cate v. Stapleton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1884-06-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1941

6 state decisions

201884189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

The Court.

¶1This action was brought to recover of the defendant, as tenant in possession of real estate purchased by plaintiff on decree of foreclosure and sale, the sum of one thousand two hundred dollars, value of the use and occupation from the day of sale to the making of the deed. The plaintiff sued out a writ of attachment by which property was attached; the defendant moved that the attachment be dissolved; the court below denied the motion, and the appeal from the order of denial is before us.

¶2Section 707 of the Code of Civil Procedure declares that the purchaser, from the time of sale, is entitled to receive from the tenant in possession, the rents of the property sold, or the value of the use and occupation.

¶3The liability of the tenant in possession to the purchaser, for rents or use and occupation from the day of sale to the expiration of the time for redemption, is a statutory liability merely, and exists without the assent of the person in possession. It is not a liability founded on a contract express or implied, within the meaning of section 537 of the Code of Civil Procedure, authorizing the issuance of an attachment.

¶4The order is reversed and the cause is remanded, with instructions to dissolve the attachment.

¶5Hearing in Bank denied.

/65/cal/360 · .json · Public domain