Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 CAL 568 - People v. Perry

People v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
8
states following
October 1965
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 1965

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

50188418901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Vasquez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I state the testimony in the case, the only testimony in the case touching the time when the watch was taken, is that tending to show it was taken near the door, and that of the defendant that he picked it up in front of the counter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Judges shall not charge juries with respect to matters of fact but may state the testimony and declare the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The testimony there certainly could be no misunderstanding with regard to.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.