Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 CAL2D 595 - People v. Stoner

People v. Stoner’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
5
states following
July 1988
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 88 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently July 1988 · most notably 71 Cal. 2d 1096 - People v. Edwards (1969), 45 Cal. 3d 1268 - People v. Williams (1988)

4 federal appellate · 88 state decisions

440196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Escobedo v. Illinois · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States · Nardone v. United States · Fahy v. Connecticut

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We need not hold that all evidence is ‘fruit of the poisonous tree’ simply because it would not have come to light but for the illegal actions of the police. Rather, the more apt question in such a case is ‘whether, granting establishment of the primary illegality, the evidence to which instant objection is made has been come at by exploitation of that illegality or instead by means sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary taint. ’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine has not been invoked when the alleged fruit is testimony of a witness to a crime whose identity was not learned through police misconduct.... Even if Greeley's courtroom identification was dependent in part on his viewing defendant in illegally obtained clothing at the showup, it was `”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.