People v. Talley’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
295 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 310 later decisions — most recently February 2005 · most notably 67 Cal. 2d 365 - People v. Lara (1967), 3 Cal. 3d 807 - People v. Superior Court (1970)
295 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Aguilar v. Texas · Jones v. United States · Escobedo v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 310 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Reasonable or probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the officers at the moment of the arrest are sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the defendant has committed an offense.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A peace officer may arrest a person without a warrant '[w]henever he has reasonable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed a felony, ...' (Pen. Code, 836.) [1] Reasonable or probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the officers at the moment of the arrest are sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the defendant has committed an offense. [Citations.] [2] The question of probable cause to justify an arrest without a warrant must be tested by the facts which the record shows were known to the officers at the time the arrest was made. [Citations.] [3] Information obtained from others may be relied upon to show probable cause. [Citations.] [4] Although information provided by a known informer of unproved reliability or by an anonymous informer is relevant on the issue of probable cause, an arrest ordinarily may not be based solely on such information, and evidence must be presented to the court that would justify the conclusion that reliance on the information was reasonable. [Citations.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It may reasonably be assumed ... that an interrogation which does elicit incriminating statements was conducted by the police for that purpose, at least in part, and ... the burden should [thus] be on the prosecution to show that [such] statements were the result of something other than a `process of interrogations that lends itself to eliciting incriminating statements....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Charles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.