Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 Cal. App. 4th 35 - People v. Murphy

65 Cal. App. 4th 35 - People v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2018

16 state decisions

80199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 29 Cal. App. 4th 1558 - People v. Garnica

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he only limitation on the number of life sentences which can be imposed is contained in section 667.61 subdivision (g), which provides that the defendant shall be sentenced to one life term per victim per occasion no matter how many offenses listed in subdivision (c) the defendant committed against a particular victim on a particular occasion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Terms for other offenses committed during a single occasion shall be imposed as authorized under any other law, including Section 667.6, if applicable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““(b) Except as provided in subdivision (a), a person who is convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (c) under one of the circumstances specified in subdivision (e) shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for life and shall not be eligible for release on parole for 15 years except as provided in subdivision (j). “(c) This section shall apply to any of the following offenses: [][]... [][] (7) A violation of subdivision (a) of Section 288 . . . . [f] . . . [f] “(e) The following circumstances shall apply to the offenses specified in subdivision (c): [][]... [f] (5) The defendant has been convicted in the present case or cases of committing an offense specified in subdivision (c) against more than one victim. [][]... [][] “(g) The term specified in subdivision (a) or (b) shall be imposed on the defendant once for any offense or offenses committed against a single victim during a single occasion. If there are multiple victims during a single occasion, the term specified in subdivision (a) or (b) shall be imposed on the defendant once for each separate victim. Terms for other offenses committed during a single occasion shall be imposed as authorized under any other law, including Section 667.6, if applicable.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.