Robinson v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Sullivan v. Stroop · 14 Cal. 4th 504 - In Re Marriage of Comer · 212 Cal. App. 3d 1072 - In Re the Marriage of Trainotti · 115 Cal. App. 3d 543 - In Re Marriage of Denney · In Re Marriage of Sandy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“directive that Social Security payments be credited against the amount 'to be paid for that month.' " ( Id. at p. 96, 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 134 .) It reasoned that the statute did not "authorize payments to be credited to amounts due in prior months, nor to accrued interest on those arrearages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Y.H. v. M.H.“the payments made by the federal government were taken into consideration by the court in determining the amount of support to be paid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Y.H. v. M.H.“payments for the support of the child made by the federal government ... shall be credited”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Y.H. v. M.H.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.