Boland v. Cecil’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
2 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2009
2 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Spokane Inland Empire Railroad Company v. United States · In Re Goddard · 98 Cal. App. 523 - Merchants Nat. Bk. v. Continental Nat. Bk. · 38 Cal. App. 2d 405 - Reed v. Molony · Louisville & N. R. v. Bosworth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Any owner of property, or a ranchman located on a definite property as a tenant, lessee or purchaser under contract may slaughter cattle in small numbers on said premises for his own consumption, and may sell or give away a portion of the meat thereof except to a peddler, retailer, hotel, restaurant, or any person offering the same for public consumption.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fairchild v. Brock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.