Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 CONNAPP 408 - Bartomeli v. Bartomeli

Bartomeli v. Bartomeli’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2022

2 district · 17 state decisions

130200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Truk-Away of Rhode Island, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. · Heath v. Vose · Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. Gallo · Amo v. Pincince · Moore v. Sergi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Pleadings have their place in our system of jurisprudence. While they are not held to the strict and artificial standard that once prevailed, we still cling to the belief, even in these iconoclastic days, that no orderly administration of justice is possible without them. . . . The purpose of the complaint is to limit the issues to be decided at the trial of a case and is calculated to prevent surprise. . . . The principle that a plaintiff may rely only upon what he has alleged is basic. . . . It is fundamental in our law that the right of a plaintiff to recover is limited to the allegations of his complaint. . . . A plaintiff may not allege one cause of action and recover on another. Facts found but not averred cannot be made the basis for a recovery.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.