In re William R.’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Luis C. · In re Tabitha · In re Hector L. · Heath v. Vose · Ricci Drain-Laying Co., Inc. v. Baskin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`In accordance with [§ 17a-112 (j)(1)], the department may meet its burden concerning reunification in one of three ways: (1) by showing that it made such efforts, (2) by showing that the parent was unable or unwilling to benefit from reunification efforts or (3) by a previous judicial determination that such efforts were not appropriate.' In re William R. III, 65 Conn.App. 538 , 546 , 782 A.2d 1262 (2001).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.