Ampex Corp. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
June 1972
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Aleksich v. Industrial Accident Fund · Goldsmith v. United States · Midland International Corp. v. United States · Andrews v. City of Butte · Morrison v. Baechtold
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Schedule 6, Part 5: Classified Under: Insulated (including enamelled or anodized) electrical conductors, whether or not fitted with connectors (including ignition wiring sets, Christmas-tree lighting sets with or without their bulbs, and other wiring sets): With fittings: 688.15 Other ..................... 17% ad val. Claimed under: Radiotelegraphic and radlotelephonic transmission and reception apparatus; radiobroadcasting and television transmission and reception apparatus, and television cameras; record players, phonographs, tape recorders, dictation recording and transcribing machines, record changers, and tone arms; all of the foregoing, and any combination thereof, whether or not incorporating clocks or other timing apparatus, and parts thereof: 685.20 Television apparatus, and parts thereof................... 10% ad val.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.