¶11. Admiralty — Jurisdiction—Bond nor Salvage.
¶2Where salved property is delivered by the salvors to the owners, upon their promise to execute a bond for salvage when requested, and such a bond is afterwards given, and dated back to a day before the delivery- of the property, a court of admiralty has jurisdiction to entertain a libel in personam on the bond.
¶3'2. Salvage — Amount oe Allowance.
¶4The steamship M., on a voyage from New Orleans to Honduras, struck a reef off the coast of Mexico, and, being in great danger of going to pieces, was abandoned by the crew. On the following day, N. and D. wént on board, brought ashore a quantity of specie, guarded it for three days, and then took it on a schooner to meet a steamer bound to Belize, put it on board such steamer, and brought it safely to Belize, incurring in these services considerable expense and considerable hardship and danger. Held, that an allowance to N. and D., as salvage, of one-third of the .value of the specie, was proper.
¶5This was a libel in personam by A. O. De Leon, executor of B. S. De Leon, against James Leitch and the firm of Lefebvre, Krug & Oswald,- upon a . bond given to secure payment 'of salvage. The bond.in question is as follows:
¶7Articles of agreement entered into at Belize, this eighth day of January, in the year one thousand eight hundred and eighty-nine, between James Michael Noricli, of New Orleans, in the United States of America, and Iteginald H: De Loon, of Puerto Cortez, in tlie republic of Honduras, of the one part, and tlie several persons or firms whose names are hereunto subscribed of the other part: Whereas, the steamship Maegregor, of Glasgow (J. S. Miller, master), having sailed from New Orleans on tlie 27th day of December last, bound on a voyage thence to Puerto Cortez, via Belize and Livingston, laden with a general cargo, and having on the evening of tlie 30th day of December, about ÍL30 o'clock, accidentally struck on a reef at Ascension Bay, on the Yucatan coast of Mexico, and remaining there fa.st and immovable, and being in grea.t danger of going to pieces and being abandoned by the crew for the night, and on the 31st day of December being still fast and in danger of breaking up, ibe parties hereto of the first part went on board the said vessel, and brought ashore a large quantity of. Specie which was laden on tlie said vessel, and buried the same in tlie sand, and guarded the same by day and by night until the third day of January, when they carried (he same on board a schooner, and took it out to sea to meet.tlie steamship Wanderer, which was expected to be' on her voyage from New Orleans to Belize; and having, on the sixth day of January, fallen in with tlie said vessel, put the said specie on board of her, gnd brought it safely to Belize, where they arrived this day; whereby, or in consequence of the' premises, the parties hereto of the first part have incurred considerable expenses, disbursements,^and charges, and have encountered considerable risks and dangers to their lives, and have been put to considerable hardships and trouble, the amount or value whereof cannot at present be sufficiently ascertained, and which may form a charge on the said specie so saved, or may come under ihe denomination of salvage to which the said parties hereto of the second part, being respectively owners or consignees, or agents of owners or consignees, of the said specie so saved, may be liable to contribute: Now, these articles witness that, in consideration of the engagements and agreements of the said parties of tlie second part hereinafter contained, tlie said James Michael Noricli and Reginald S. De Leon engage and agree with each of the said parties of tlie second part that they shall, and will deliver, or caused to be delivered, as soon as can be conveniently done, at the port of Belize, aforesaid, and on reasonable request, the respective amounts of specie so laden on board tlie said steamship Maegregor, and so saved belonging or consigned, respectively, unto tlie several parties of the second part, his or their factors, agents, or assigns, and permit them to- receive, take possession, and remove the same according to tlieir respective rights, positions, or ownerships thereof, in consideration whereof the said parties hereto of the second part do hereby for themselves, severally and respectively, and not jointly, personally engage and agree with the said James Michael Norich and Reginald S. De Leon, jointly and severally, to pay, or cause to be paid, unto the said James Michael Noricli and Reginald S. De Leon, or unto their executors, administrators, or assigns, their proper and respective proportions of the said salvage in respect of their respective sums of specie so saved, and all legal charges and other expenses to which the said parties of the second part are or shall be respectively liable, or which the said specie ought to bear under tlie aforesaid circumstances, ratably and in fair proportions, according as the amount and proportions thereof may be ascertained and adjusted by any court of law having competent jurisdiction in the premises, or by private arrangement, among all the parties hereto. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands, the day and year first above written.
¶8[Signed] J. M. Norich.
¶9p. p. R. S. De Leon,
¶10A. O. De Leon.
¶11Mutrie, Arthur & Currie.
¶12Lefebvre, Krug & Oswald.
¶13James Leiteh.,
¶14W. J. McKinney,
¶15Actg. Secy, on Behalf of the Government of British Honduras.
¶18This is a libel in personam by the testamentary executor of one of two salvors, on a bond given to secure the payment of salvage. The original libel averred that tbe specie saved was delivered to the consignees, and that thereafter, the salvors having communicated' with the consignees, the latter signed the bond. Under such allegations, it may be that libel-ant could not recover in this court. Cutler v. Rae, 7 How. 729; Railway Co. v. Swan, 111 U. S. 384, 4 Sup. Ct. 510. The libel was amended so as to aver that the bond was signed prior to and as a condition of the delivery of the specie. Subsequently, a further amendment was made to the libel, so as to aver that, prior to the delivery of the specie to the consignees, they agreed to give the bond. 1 am satisfied that the last amendment sets out the real facts. The receipts which the consignees gave when they received their specie, state that they agree to sign a bond when called upon to do so. The bond was doubtless postdated, but I do not see that such action was objectionable, under the circumstances. The specie was delivered under a written promise to sign a bond, and subsequently the bond was executed by all parties, dating it back to the date of the delivery. No one complains of this. Under the allegations of the second amendment to the íibel and the facts which support them, the court has jurisdiction. Coast Wrecking Co. v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 7 Fed. 236; Maury v. Culliford, 10 Fed. 388; The John M. Chambers, 24 Fed. 383; L’Amerique, 35 Fed. 835; Olivari v. Insurance Co., 37 Fed. 894; Sweeney v. Thompson, 39 Fed. 121. See notes foot of page 166, Ben. Adm. (Ed. 1894). That a passenger, in a proper case, may recover salvage, is settled. The Connemara, 108 U. S. 353, 2 Sup. Ct. 754.
¶19The total amount of specie saved was about $21,244. Only two of the consignees who signed the bond are before the court,—James Leitch, for whom $3,700 were saved; and the firm of Lefebvre, Krug & Oswald, for which $1,288.25 in Mexican dollars, worth $950 in American money, were saved. The services rendered were highly meritorious. The bond, signed by all the parties, recites that the salvors “have incurred considerable expenses, disbursements, and charges, and have encountered considerable risks and dangers to their lives, and have been put to considerable hardships and trouble." Under the circumstances, I consider that an allowance for salvage of one-third of the sums saved is just and proper. Of course, the libelant can recover but one-half of the salvage; the other salvor, Norich, not having sued. There will therefore be a decree in favor of libelant against James Leiteh for one-sixth of $3,700, or $616.66|; and against the firm of Lefebvre, Krug & Oswald for one-sixth of $950, or $158.33),, and costs.
¶20Let W. B. Schmidt, the attorney in fact of Herman Krug, be notified of the rendition of the decree.