Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

65 F. 98

Docket No. 2,815.

Dunham Manuf'g Co. v. Coburn Trolley Track Manuf'g Co.

United States Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · decided 1891-03-07

<p>Patents — Injunction.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1893

Relies on Pratt v. Sencenbaugh

Cited in Bouvier (1914)’s definition of “Maritime Tort”

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1891-03-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Patents — Injunction.

¶2COLT, Circuit Judge.

¶3This cause came on to be heard upon motion-of complainant for a preliminary injunction, and was argued by counsel for respective parties, and now, to wit, March 7, 1891, it is ordered by the court that writ of injunction issue as prayed for in the bill of complaint herein, enjoining and restraining said defendants from directly or indirectly making, constructing, using, or vending in others, to be- used, any door hangers or other articles containing or embodying the invention secured and described in the second and *99third claims of the United States letters patent, numbered 7,795 of reissues, reissued July 17, 1877, to Elias E. Pratt* for improvement in door-hanging devices, until the further order of court.

¶4See Pratt v. Sencenbaugh, 64 Fed. 779.

/65/f1d/98 · .json · Public domain