Bartlett Frazier Co. v. Hyde’s Empirical Analysis
65 F.2d 350 · 1933
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1968
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 7 U.S.C. § 12 · 7 U.S.C. § 8
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Olsen U S · Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co. · Oklahoma Operating Co. v. Love · Chicago St Ry Co v. State of Minnesota Railroad and Warehouse Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“forbids the revealing by the Secretary and his assistants of individual trades and of customers; and the findings here, predicated on the evidence, show that in the decade of experience since the act became operative no instances appear where any such confidence has been violated * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Freeman v. Seligson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.