Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 F.2d 444 - Gerould Co. v. Arnold Constable & Co.

Gerould Co. v. Arnold Constable & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

65 F.2d 444 · 1933

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 1983
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1983

3 state decisions

20193319401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co. · New York Bank Note Co. v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving & Printing Co. · Paige v. . Faure · Roberts v. Lynn Ice Co. · Marcelle, Inc. v. Sol. & S. Marcus Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.