Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 F.2d 719 - Bertelsen v. White

Bertelsen v. White’s Empirical Analysis

65 F.2d 719 · 1933

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2015

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

50193319401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Twin City Nat Bank of New Brighton v. Nebecker · United States v. Norton · Atlantic & Caribbean Steam Navigation Co. v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not a bill to raise revenue.... On the contrary, it diminishes the revenue of the government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.