Alexander v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
65 F.2d 752 · 1933
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1981
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co. · Offer v. Superior Court · People v. Boggess · Swarts v. Siegel · Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. v. Hines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““One who acquires or succeeds to rights, claims or securities through subrogation takes them burdened with the limitations and disqualifications to which they were subject in the hands of the person for whom he is substituted. The rights he acquires thereby are not greater nor better than those which the person for whom he is substituted had at the time of the payment which effected the subrogation.” (Citing inter alia, In Re Paoli Lithia Springs Hotel Co. (7th Circuit, 1925), 5 F. 2d 902 .) Alexander v. Young (1933), 65 F. 2d 752, 757 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.